Home \ Browse Journal \ 2019 \ 2019 Issue 1 \ Alkylation of Cymantrene with 1-Bromoadamantane Initiated by Iron Pentacarbonyl, INEOS OPEN, 2019, 2 (1), 29-32

2019 Volume 2 Issue 1


INEOS OPEN, 2019, 2 (1), 29–32 

Journal of Nesmeyanov Institute of Organoelement Compounds
of the Russian Academy of Sciences

Download PDF
Electronic supplementary information

DOI: 10.32931/io1905a


Alkylation of Cymantrene with 1-Bromoadamantane Initiated by Iron Pentacarbonyl

Т. Т. Vasil'eva, H. H. Hambardzumyan, N. Е. Mysova, O. N. Gorunova, and K. A. Kochetkov*

Nesmeyanov Institute of Organoelement Compounds, Russian Academy of Sciences, ul. Vavilova 28, Moscow, 119991 Russia

Corresponding author: K. A. Kochetkov, e-mail: const@ineos.ac.ru 
Received 24 May 2018; accepted 10 November 2018




The reaction of cymantrene with 1-bromoadamantane is efficiently initiated by iron pentacarbonyl, affording a range of new alkyl and dialkyl-substituted products.

Key words: alkylcymantrenes, iron pentacarbonyl, alkylation with 1-bromoadamantane.



The ability of iron pentacarbonyl to initiate a range of С–С bond forming reactions is well known [1–9]. Iron pentacarbonyl (Fe(CO)5) was shown to promote the addition of α-halocarboxylic acid esters and nitriles to aldehydes and ketones by the Reformatsky-type reaction [1–3]. It was used successfully in diastereoselective hydrodimerization of aromatic aldehydes leading to diols [4], stereoselective reductive dimerization of chiral α-bromoamides resulting in bis(amides) [5], and addition of С4F9I to pentafluorobenzaldehyde [6] and benzyl bromide by the Zaitsev–Barbier reaction [7, 8].

Recently, in an attempt to accomplish the addition of 1-bromoadamantane to pentafluorobenzaldehyde by the Zaitsev–Barbier reaction in the presence of Fe(CO)5 upon heating in aromatic solvents (benzene, toluene, chlorobenzene), we found that the desired reaction did not take place. Instead, the solvent, usually being inert under reaction conditions, underwent alkylation under action of the alkyl halide, which resulted in 1-aryladamantanes in high yields [9]. Thus, we revealed the ability of iron pentacarbonyl to initiate the Friedel–Crafts alkylation with 1-bromoadamantane. Later Khusnutdinov et al. suggested [10] other metal complexes as the catalysts for adamantylation of aromatic compounds. The possibility of alkylation of aromatic compounds with 1-bromoadamantane I under action of different Friedel–Crafts catalysts was shown earlier [11, 12], but metal carbonyls have not been used for this purpose. Furthermore, the reported examples required high temperatures, prolonged stirring, inert atmosphere, and, as a rule, high loadings (1–2 mol. eq) of the initiator to ensure the reaction completion and, in some cases, afforded lower yields of alkylation products. The reactions catalyzed by the Lewis acids often proceed under heterogeneous conditions [11, 12]. The use of iron or antimony chlorides leads to partial chlorination of adamantane [13]. Recent examples involve the use of rare reagents such as indium halides [14].

Sterically hindered reagent I was used in alkylation [11–14] and cross-couplings [15, 16] to introduce a bulky adamantyl moiety, which imparts specific physicochemical properties to products [17] and significantly changes their physiological activity [13, 18]. Nowadays, of particular interest is the development of antirabic vaccines based on aryl derivatives of adamantane [19]. Of note is also the antiproliferative activity of aminoadamantane [20].

Herein, we report on the initiating effect of Fe(CO)5 on the alkylation of a representative of another class of aromatic compounds, namely, cymantrene II under action of alkyl bromide I. The alkylation of thermally unstable and light-sensitive aromatic organometallic compounds such as cymantrene II in the presence of acid catalysts proceeds nonselectively and is often accompanied by resinification [21, 22], therefore, it is usually accomplished by indirect routes via modification of other derivatives [23].

Results and discussion

The reaction of 1-bromoadamantane I with cymantrene II in cyclohexane in the presence of Fe(CO)5 (2 mol. eq) upon heating at 80 °С resulted in the high conversion of the reagents already over 2 h and, depending on the ratio of reagents, afforded a mixture of new products of mono- and dialkylation of cymantrene, adamantylcymantrene III and 1,3-diada-mantylcymantrene IV, with domination of one of them along with the small amount of 1-(3-bromoadamantyl)-3-adamantylcymantrene V. In the absence of Fe(CO)5, the reaction did not take place. Furthermore, the reaction result strongly depended on the solvent in use. Thus, the application of dichloromethane and dichlorobenzene led to trace amounts of the products of chlorination of compounds III and IV, which were identified using mass spectrometry. The use of Fe(CO)5 as a solvent, reported earlier in the literature [24], in this case led to a decrease in the product yields. Compounds IIIV were isolated by preparative TLC on silica gel.

According to the NMR spectroscopic data, the main reaction product at 1:1 ratio of the reagents was adamantylcymantrene III, which was obtained in 50% yield, whereas the minor product, 1,3-diadamantylcymantrene IV, was formed in <5% yield. A double excess of bromoadamantane relative to cymantrene afforded, along with monoalkylation product III (16%) and main dialkylation product IV (42%), 1-(3-bromoadamantyl)-3-adamantylcymantrene V (15%), which was likely to result from the bromination of compound IV. The mass spectrometric analysis of the final product mixture revealed trace amounts of another bromination product, monobromoadamantylcymantrene VI, and the product of hydrolysis of starting compound II, adamantyl alcohol VII.

The structures of products IIIV (Scheme 1) were supported by the IR and NMR spectroscopic as well as mass spectrometric data. The structures of compounds IV, V were also elucidated by single-crystal XRD (for preliminary crystallographic data, see Electronic Supplementary Information).


Scheme 1. Alkylation of cymantrene with 1-bromoadamantane.

The plausible mechanism of alkylation includes the formation of an intermediate complex of Fe(CO)5 with bromoadamantane that activates alkyl halide [25] and gives rise to a radical, as it was assumed earlier [6–8]. The reaction conditions explored are likely to facilitate the formation of a sterically hindered radical or radical ion [26, 27]. Subsequent processes comprise the alkylation of the aromatic ring or intermediate addition at the central atom of cymantrene, as it was supposed earlier for other species [23], followed by alkylation by the ricochet mechanism [28]. The second substitution with the adamantyl fragment occurs at the third position of the ring due steric hindrances. The radical mechanism of cymantrene alkylation is also supported by the formation of bromo derivatives V and VI as a result of substitution at the tertiary carbon atom of the adamantyl moiety and the formation of products of partial chlorination of compounds III and IV in the reactions in dichloromethane and dichlorobenzene.


General remarks

The 1Н NMR spectra were registered on a Bruker WP-400 spectrometer (400 MHz) using CDCl3 as a solvent. The chemical shifts are presented relative to tetramethylsilane. The IR spectra were recorded on a UR-20 spectrometer. The mass spectra were obtained on a Finigan SSQ-7000 mass spectrometer with the direct injection of samples and the ionizing voltage of 70 eV. The XRD experiments were carried out with a SMART 1000 CCD diffractometer (Mo Ka radiation, graphite monochromator, w-scanning) at 120 K.

The reaction course was monitored by TLC on aluminum plates with 60 F254 neutral aluminum oxide carrier of Merck production in petroleum ether (40–70 °С)–ethyl acetate (10:1). The reaction products were isolated from the reaction mixture using preparative thin-layer chromatography on glass plates with 60 PF254 silica gel containing 30% of gypsum (Merck). Bromoadamantane was purchased from Aldrich. Fe(CO)5 was purchased from Fluka (98%) and used without further purification.


Alkylation of cymantrene with 1-bromoadamantane in the presence of iron pentacarbonyl (1:2 ratio).

A double-neck flask equipped with a condenser, stirrer, and Tishchenko bottle was charged with a mixture of cymantrene II (0.246 g, 1 mmol) and bromoadamantane I (0.459 g, 2 mmol) in cyclohexane (2 mL) under vigorous stirring. Then Fe(CO)5 (0.27 mL, 2 mmol) was added. After dissolution of the components (10–15 min), the reaction mixture was stirred upon heating at 80 °С for 5 h. The reaction can be promoted by addition of a drop of ~1% solution of CBrCl3 in cyclohexane as an activator. No evolution of СО was detected. The reaction mixture was evaporated and extracted with 10 mL of benzene. The resulting residue was treated with 30 mL of 1 N aq. HCl and additionally extracted with benzene. The combined benzene fractions were washed with water (×3) and dried over anhydrous Na2SO4. The solvent was removed under vacuum, and the residue obtained (0.454 g) was washed with methanol (2×5 mL) and decanted (the mass of the dry residue comprised 0.152 g). Then the methanol solution was evaporated to give 0.270 g of a mixture of compounds IIIVI. The products were separated by preparative TLC on silica gel (eluent: petroleum ether), which afforded three fractions. The first fraction contained the product of hydrolysis of I (0.092 g) (<1 %), according to the mass spectrometric data, adamantyl alcohol VII. The second fraction (0.062 g) comprised initial cymantrene II (75% conversion). According to the NMR spectroscopic data, the third fraction (0.120 g) involved a mixture of 1,3-diadamantylcymantrene IV (23%, calculated per unreacted compound II) and adamantylcymantrene III (16%, calculated per unreacted compound II) in 2:1 ratio. The latter (0.153 g) was dissolved in CHCl3 and additionally purified by preparative TLC on silica gel (eluent: petroleum ether) to give two products. The first product (0.063 g, 15%, calculated per unreacted compound II) represented bromodiadamantylcymantrene V bearing trace amounts of bromoadamantylcymantrene VI, and the second product (0.066 g, 19%, calculated per unreacted product II) was 1,3-diadamantylcymantrene IV.

Alkylation of cymantrene with 1-bromoadamantane in the presence of iron pentacarbonyl (1:1 ratio).

The reaction was carried out upon stirring of a mixture of cymantrene II (0.271 g, 1.1 mmol), bromoadamantane I (0.253 g, 1.1 mmol), Fe(CO)5 (0.30 mL, (2.2 mmol), and cyclohexane (2 mL) at 80 °С for 4 h. The conversion of II composed 70%. The isolation of adamantylcymantrene III was carried out analogously to the above example from the methanol extract (0.132 g, 50%, calculated per unreacted compound II).

Adamantylcymantrene, III. 1Н NMR (δ, ppm): 1.77 (m, 12Н), 2.07 (m, 3Н), 4.62 (m, 2Н), 4.90 (m, 2Н). MS, m/z (Irel, %): 338 [М]+• (13), 282 [М–2CO]+• (10), 272 [М–66]+• (23), 254 [М–3CO]+• (100), 252 (26), 199 [M–3CO–Mn]+ (18). Anal. Calcd for C18H24MnO3: C, 63.52; H, 7.32. Found: C, 62.97; H, 7.05%.

1,3-Diadamantylcymantrene, IV. 1Н NMR (δ, ppm): 1.75 (m, 18Н), 2.08 (m, 4Н), 2.30 (8Н), 4.63 (м, 2Н), 4.88 (s, 1Н). IR (KBr, n/cm–1): 2907, 2850 (С–Ad), 2001, 1928, 1909 (С=О). MS, m/z (Irel, %): 472 [М]+• (3), 406 [М–66]+• (32), 388 [М–3CO]+• (100), 333 (13), 135 [Ad]+ (28).

1-(3-Bromoadamantyl)-3adamantylcymantrene, V. MS, m/z (Irel, %): 550/552 [М]+• (3/3), 484/486 [М–66]+• (23/23), 466/468 [М–3CO]+• (17/17), 400 (10), 386 [M–3CO–HBr]+• (20), 135 [Ad]+ (100).

Bromoadamantylcymantrene, VI. MS, m/z (Irel, %): 416/418 [М]+• (6/6), 360/362 [М–2CO]+• (18/18), 350/352 [М–66]+• (31/28), 332/334 [М–3CO]+• (100/90), 290/292 (15/16), 276/278 (55/53), 252 [M–3CO–HBr]+• (82), 196 [C15H16]+• (97), 141 (47), 128 (28), 115 (34), 93 [C7H9] + (63), 91[C7H7]+ (43), 79 [C6H7]+ (12), 77 [C6H5]+ (20), 55 [Мn]+ (25).

The structures of crystalline products IVV were elucidated by XRD. The mass spectrum of adamantyl alcohol VII completely coincided with the previously published data [29].


Hence, we succeeded in efficient initiation of cymantrene alkylation with 1-bromoadamantane under action of iron pentacarbonyl, which led to a range of new mono- and disubstituted products. Unlike the previously reported example of alkylation of aromatic compounds with bulky adamantyl fragment [10], in our case the relative content of dialkylated products were high. This example open new opportunities for the application of iron pentacarbonyl as an initiator for different С–С bond forming reactions involving not only aliphatic [1–8] and aromatic [9] derivatives, but also organometallic compounds.


This work was carried out in the framework of the state assignment for INEOS RAS.

The authors are grateful to the contribution of Center for molecular composition studies of INEOS RAS.

Electronic supplementary information

Electronic supplementary information (ESI) available online: preliminary X-ray crystallographic data for compounds IV and V


  1. T. T. Vasil'eva, N. A. Kuz'mina, O. V. Chakhovskaya, N. E. Mysova, A. B. Terent'ev, Russ. J. Org. Chem., 2004, 40, 174–177. DOI: 10.1023/B:RUJO.0000034937.39138.2a
  2. A. B. Terent'ev, T. T. Vasil'eva, O. V. Chakhovskaya, N. E. Mysova, K. A. Kochetkov, Russ. J. Org. Chem., 2005, 41, 1615–1618. DOI: 10.1007/s11178-006-0007-y
  3. A. B. Тerent'ev, T. T. Vasil'eva, O. V. Chahovskaya, N. E. Mysova, H. H. Hambardzumyan, K. A. Kochetkov, J. Fluorine Chem., 2008, 129, 669–673. DOI: 10.1016/j.jfluchem.2008.05.017
  4. A. B. Terent'ev, T. T. Vasil'eva, O. V. Chakhovskaya, N. E. Mysova, K. A. Kochetkov, Russ. J. Org. Chem., 2007, 43, 518–521. DOI: 10.1134/S107428007040057
  5. N. Yu. Kuznetsov, V. N. Khrustalev, A. B. Terent'ev, Yu. N. Belokon, Russ. Chem. Bull., 2001, 50, 548–550. DOI: 10.1023/A:1011398215836
  6. T. T. Vasil'eva, N. E. Mysova, O. V. Chakhovskaya, A. B. Terent'ev, Russ. J. Org. Chem., 2002, 38, 1014–1017. DOI: 10.1023/A:1020857730190
  7. A. B. Terent'ev, T. T. Vasil'eva, A. A. Ambartsumyan, O. V. Chakhovskaya, N. E. Mysova, K. A. Kochetkov, Russ. J. Org. Chem., 2009, 45, 1181–1184. DOI: 10.1134/S1070428009080119
  8. T. T. Vasil'eva, A. A. Ambartsumyan, O. V. Chakhovskaya, K. A. Kochetkov, Russ. J. Org. Chem., 2010, 46, 631–633. DOI: 10.1134/S1070428010050040
  9. A. A. Ambartsumyan, T. T. Vasil'eva, O. V. Chakhovskaya, N. E. Mysova, K. A. Kochetkov, Russ. J. Org. Chem., 2014, 50, 752–754. DOI: 10.1134/S1070428014050236
  10. R. I. Khusnutdinov, N. A. Shchadneva, L. F. Khisanova, Russ. J. Org. Chem., 2015, 51, 1545–1550. DOI: 10.1134/S1070428015110056
  11. G. A. Kraus, T. M. Siclovan, J. Org. Chem., 1994, 59, 922–923. DOI: 10.1021/jo00083a038
  12. J. Clariana, S. García-Granda, V. Gotor, A. Gutiérrez-Fernández, A. Luna, M. Moreno-Mañas, A. Vallribera, Tetrahedron: Asymmetry, 2000, 11, 4549–4557. DOI: 10.1016/S0957-4166(00)00428-6
  13. H. Stetter, J. Weber, C. Wulff, Chem. Ber, 1964, 97, 3488–3492. DOI: 10.1002/cber.19640971233
  14. P. Mosset, R. Grée, Synlett, 2013, 24, 1142–1146. DOI: 10.1055/s-0032-1316909
  15. S. Bräse, B. Waegell, A. de Meijere, Synthesis, 1998, 148–152. DOI: 10.1055/s-1998-2013
  16. M. Ohno, K. Shimizu, K. Ishizaki, T. Sasaki, S. Eguchi, J. Org. Chem., 1988, 53, 729–733. DOI: 10.1021/jo00239a005
  17. R. P. Reddy, G. H. Lee, H. M. L. Davies, Org. Letters, 2006, 8, 3437–3440. DOI: 10.1021/ol060893l
  18. P. A. Krasutskii, I. G. Semenova, M. I. Novikova, A. G. Yurchenko, N. A. Leont'eva, T. V. Veselovskaya, Pharm. Chem. J., 1987, 21, 512–515. DOI: 10.1007/BF00758765
  19. G. I. Danilenko, E. A. Shablovskaya, L. A. Antonova, A. V. Guzhova, I. A. Lobanova, A. P. Dyachenko, A. I. Panasyuk, Pharm. Chem. J., 1998, 32, 83–85. DOI: 10.1007/BF02464169
  20. A. Koperniku, A.-S. Foscolos, I. Papanastasiou, G. B. Foscolos, A. Tsotinis, D. Schols, Lett. Org. Chem., 2016, 13, 171–176. DOI: 10.2174/1570178613666160104233856
  21. M. P. Balem, M. Le Plouzennec, M. Louer, Nouv. J. Chim., 1981, 5, 283–292.
  22. M. P. Balem, M. Le Plouzennec, M. Louer, Inorg. Chem., 1982, 21, 2573–2578. DOI: 10.1021/ic00137a009
  23. A. G. Ginzburg, Russ. Chem. Rev., 1993, 62, 1025–1045. DOI: 10.1070/RC1993v062n11ABEH000062
  24. N. A. Belozerskii, O. D. Krichevskaya, R. L. Meltser, A. I. Vereshchagina, N. E. Kolobova, K. N. Anisimov, Zh. Neorg. Khim., 1967, 12, 2481–2485.
  25. L. V. Balabanova, A. B. Terent'ev, T. T. Vasil'eva, S. O. Gapusenko, T. D. Churkina, Zh. Org. Khim., 1993, 63. 2267–2270.
  26. Yu. A. Belousov, Russ. Chem. Rev., 2007, 76, 41–58. DOI: 10.1070/RC2007v076n01ABEH003658
  27. Y. A. Belousov, T. A. Belousova, Polyhedron, 1999, 18, 2605–2608. DOI: 10.1016/S0277-5387(99)00164-3
  28. P. Kovacic, J.-H. C. Chang, J. Org. Chem., 1971, 36, 3138–3145. DOI: 10.1021/jo00820a015
  29. R. I. Khusnutdinov, N. A. Shchadneva, L. F. Mukhametshina, Russ. J. Org. Chem., 2010, 46, 820–822. DOI: 10.1134/S1070428010060084